<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RadarDetector123.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radardetector123.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radardetector123.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detectors News and Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:29:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by onewxone</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>onewxone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>dont﻿ use two rd&#039;s together.  affects performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont﻿ use two rd&#8217;s together.  affects performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by Marianmichael100</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianmichael100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>﻿ i run 2 radar detecors  together  and theywork very welltogether 

valentine one  ad Beltronics sti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿ i run 2 radar detecors  together  and theywork very welltogether </p>
<p>valentine one  ad Beltronics sti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by HTDGFilms</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>HTDGFilms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>Hahaha I love how quick you snap to the Valentine when it﻿ first goes off.  Like a fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha I love how quick you snap to the Valentine when it﻿ first goes off.  Like a fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by PygoManiac</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>PygoManiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>Its like they are talking to﻿ each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its like they are talking to﻿ each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by cadw600</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4378</link>
		<dc:creator>cadw600</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4378</guid>
		<description>is the valentine one﻿ casing metal or plastic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the valentine one﻿ casing metal or plastic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by lamboleum</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>lamboleum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>Its actually magnesium. I guess its﻿ better at heat dissipation and lighter and helps to shield from radar leaking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its actually magnesium. I guess its﻿ better at heat dissipation and lighter and helps to shield from radar leaking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by lamboleum</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>lamboleum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>When they﻿ both started getting excited I couldn&#039;t stop laughing. Sounds so funny with two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they﻿ both started getting excited I couldn&#8217;t stop laughing. Sounds so funny with two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by SanAntonio78210</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4375</link>
		<dc:creator>SanAntonio78210</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4375</guid>
		<description>they receive NOT TRANSMIT..﻿</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they receive NOT TRANSMIT..﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by MrRussianProud</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>MrRussianProud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>radars are no good. cops out smart them. they have to two ways that work perfectyl for them. 1. is they use a laser, and once﻿ the radar beeps its too late, 2. is they have their radar off and turn it on once they spot a speeder. and in both cases the radar does not work wats so ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radars are no good. cops out smart them. they have to two ways that work perfectyl for them. 1. is they use a laser, and once﻿ the radar beeps its too late, 2. is they have their radar off and turn it on once they spot a speeder. and in both cases the radar does not work wats so ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Valentine One Radar Detectors vs Ka &#8211; 3.863 and 3.763 by fx104elec</title>
		<link>http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>fx104elec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radardetector123.com/2012/04/two-valentine-one-radar-detectors-vs-ka-3-863-and-3-763/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>Complete V1BlueShark beta edition for Android phones which can receive V1 signal and show it in 2D Graphical layout with repeated Voice Alarms for all bands.
Next Version will add GPS, Auto Mute and database functions which can replace [ audio alarm(but with voice) +﻿ Remote Display + the new Savvy device ]
Test it with success using Huawei u8180 (Android v2.2)
xxx.v1blueshark.20m.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete V1BlueShark beta edition for Android phones which can receive V1 signal and show it in 2D Graphical layout with repeated Voice Alarms for all bands.<br />
Next Version will add GPS, Auto Mute and database functions which can replace [ audio alarm(but with voice) +﻿ Remote Display + the new Savvy device ]<br />
Test it with success using Huawei u8180 (Android v2.2)<br />
xxx.v1blueshark.20m.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

